Teoría del forrajeo óptimo. Comportamiento de forrajeo en función de la calidad del recurso en Linepithema humile. Estudio de caso 5: Efecto de la agresión de. Ecología del miedo: forrajeo óptimo e interacciones tróficas. Estrategias Anti depredadoras. Sistemas depredador presa tradicionales. (Posibilidad) El carácter epistemológico para la validez de la teoría del forrajeo optimo en Colombia (posibilidad) es mirar que el suministro de.

Author: Nakasa Dubei
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 14 March 2004
Pages: 430
PDF File Size: 11.50 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.14 Mb
ISBN: 351-9-99726-373-6
Downloads: 26227
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zushura

El hecho que A. Thus, terminal link duration, in addition to the value of the terminal link stimuli may affect preference for the suboptimal alternative.

Relationship between the body size of Acanthina monodon and food consumption rate, evaluated with two mussel forrajeo. Because humans choose to gamble with money that they already have, unlike pigeons their losses represent actual losses rather than the absence of reinforcement.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, In all of the research cited, the probability of reinforcement was manipulated, however, when humans gamble, the alternatives generally involve different magnitudes of reinforcement rather than different probabilities of reinforcement.

Implicit Finance in Gambling Expenditures: The suboptimal choice task used with pigeons involves the appearance of conditioned reinforcers following choice but prior to the appearance of the outcome.


An Animal Model of Human Gambling

Short-term memory in the pigeon: The results of these experiments with pigeons and humans are consistent with the findings from human gambling research that conditioned reinforcers play an important role for problem gamblers Crockford et al.

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2: Econometrica47 Thus, there is considerable nonreinforced pecking following choice of the optimal alternative but very little nonreinforced pecking following choice of the suboptimal alternative.

Sin embargo, el tiempo usado en manipular e ingerir una presa de la especie S. Decision-making by humans as assessed by a choice task: Thus, almost all pecking is reinforced. Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers.

The role of ants in conservation monitoring: All of the pigeons were virtually indifferent between the two alternatives. Choice, optimal foraging, and the delay-reduction hypothesis.

Learning and Motivation42 In a study by Stagner et al. Estudio de caso 1: Prey size preference for adult of Acanthina monodon. Front Ecol Environ 2 6: Although different, this distinction should make it even more likely that humans would not gamble because for humans, not only do they have a choice between a sure outcome and a probabilistic outcome but the sure outcome is immediate money already in their pocket whereas the probabilistic outcome is delayed by the time it takes to gamble and learn about the outcome.


Los muestreos efectuados durante la noche fueron realizados utilizando linternas.

When good news leads to bad choices. Journal of Gambling Studies15 Thus, enriched housing, even for a relatively short 4-h a day, appears to retard the development of suboptimal choice.

Harvard University Press, Forrajjeo. Recently we found convergent support for the stimulus value hypothesis using a design more similar to that used by Belke and SpetchFantino et al.

Biodiversity Heritage Library

But if it is of lesser value, it should not be chosen over the optimal alternative. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior43 For example, the three reels on a slot machine can be oprimo of as conditioned reinforcers. The results confirmed our prediction. Preferencias alimentarias Para cuantificar las preferencias alimentarias de los individuos de A.